on Object Oriented philosophy: http://www.urbanomic.com/Publications/Object-Oriented-Philosophy/preface.pdf
read any two. come with three questions!
Fad or Functional? Anarchist or quite the opposite? This week we will discuss Accelerationism
At 7pm, we will potluck. Bring food!
Then, at 8pm we will watch Part 2 of the Mayfair Set.
Lastly, at 9pm, if we can keep our food down, we will discuss the horror (ahem…Halloween!!) and beauty that is Bataille (the readings are from last week, which got “cancelled” ).
preparty for ebab – fights and fun!
three pieces from the new black seed (#2): the two anthropology pieces (by aragorn! and kevin tucker, respectively) and the white nationalism piece.
the premise is that there is a thread (or more) linking these three essays.
find the thread!
and this is sort of still on the topic of how we talk to people who disagree with us; the various formats at our disposal and how those formats are best used.
sorry this is so late!
we are taking the concept and practice of talking to people we don’t agree with, in particular leftists.
how to do it, why to do it, and when to do it. and what the various formats that we operate within (ie communicating online, etc) allow for and discourage.
these are in chronological order, and refer to each other, so best to read them this way.
Here are three readings by Enrico Malatesta
Here are some questions that relate to Malatesta